When you look at the group of normal features, we are able to consist of both certain areas which have been mainly kept to nature, and “natural” areas produced by individual intervention.
- Topography. A place’s topography could be the form of its landscape. Could be the grouped community mostly hilly, mostly flat, or does it incorporate regions of both? Is water — streams, creeks, lakes and ponds, canals, seashore — a noticeable or essential the main real character of this community? Whom lives in exactly what regions of the city?
- Open greenery and space. Is here open room spread through the community, or perhaps is it restricted to one or several areas? Simply how much available room is here? Could it be mostly man-made (parks, commons, campuses, recreations industries), or will there be backwoods or semi-wilderness? Does the grouped community provide the impression to be green and leafy, with a lot of woods and lawn, or perhaps is it mostly tangible or dust?
- Water and air. May be the fresh air fairly clear and clean, or perhaps is here a blanket of smog? Does the atmosphere generally smell fresh, or is there commercial or any other odors that are unpleasant? Do streams, lakes, or other figures of water look clean? Do they be seemingly employed for fun (boating, swimming, fishing)?
There clearly was an overlap between your community’s real and social faculties. Does the lay of this land ensure it is tough to get in one area of the community to a different? (Biking, or perhaps in some situations also walking, is hard in bay area, as an example, due to the size and steepness of this hills.) Are there any clear social divisions that mirror the landscape — most of the fancy homes within the hills, most of the low-income housing in the flats, by way of example? (more…)